Philosophizing in a Globalized World (GloPhi) is a Center for Advanced Studies at Hildesheim University funded by the German Research Foundation (DFG). Our aim is to pluralize the canon of philosophy by combining methodologies from cross-cultural philosophy and decolonial theory. Building on the findings of the research project Histories of Philosophy in a Global Perspective, we aim at creating the Hildesheim Encyclopedia of Philosophy (HePS), a database of philosophical documents and practices from a diverse set of languages and regions with commentaries from experts. Additionally, we organize a broad range of events to connect academic and public discourse and invite Fellows from around the world to work with us locally at our center in Hildesheim.
In an era marked by intensified global interconnectivity, technological transformation, and resurgent political polarizations, the role and responsibility of philosophy – and philosophy education – require urgent rethinking. Philosophy, as both a discipline and a pedagogical practice, is undergoing profound questioning regarding its relevance, accessibility, and epistemological foundations. What does it mean to philosophize in a world that is simultaneously global and fractured, interconnected yet unequal? How can philosophy curricula respond to, rather than retreat from, the complexities of the 21st century?
In einer Welt, die immer stärker durch globale Verflechtungen, kulturelle Übersetzungsprozesse und vielfältige Wissensformen geprägt ist, steht auch die Philosophie vor der Aufgabe, ihre eigenen Voraussetzungen kritisch zu befragen. Um Orientierung in einer globalisierten Welt bieten zu können, bedarf es einer Philosophie, die sich ihrer historischen und kulturellen Situiertheit bewusst ist und ihre Geschichte nicht länger ausschließlich aus der Perspektive Europas erzählt. Die Vorlesung „Geschichten der Philosophie in globaler Perspektive“ führt in methodische und systematische Fragen einer globalen Philosophiegeschichtsschreibung ein. Im Mittelpunkt steht dabei nicht die bloße Erweiterung der bekannten Kanons, sondern die grundsätzliche Reflexion darüber, was „Philosophiegeschichte“ im Kontext globaler Wissensordnungen überhaupt bedeuten kann.
The academic discipline of philosophy is still defined by a Eurocentric framework that excludes philosophical traditions and actors from vast regions of the globe, not least among these the rich and diverse traditions of African philosophy. Consequently, African philosophers rarely appear in teaching curricula or as speakers in European and North American academic settings. Their current omission from mainstream discourses and teaching materials cannot only be ascribed to unfamiliarity or ignorance of their ideas; it reflects a long-standing historical devaluation and marginalization of African philosophy from a long list of European thinkers who, like Hegel, explicitly rejected African philosophy as part of a global historiography of philosophy.
As part of the ongoing efforts of our Center to explore global intellectual histories and philosophies beyond established Eurocentric canons, the Database Initiative aims to build an open-access digital infrastructure for the documentation, interconnection, and visualization of philosophical sources and traditions from around the world. The initiative operates from 2025 to 2028 as a core sub-project of the Center and brings together an interdisciplinary team of philosophers, digital humanists, and data scientists. Its central goal is to create the Hildesheim Encyclopedia of Philosophical Sources (HePS) — a dynamic knowledge graph that models and contextualizes sources of philosophizing across cultures, languages, and historical periods.
With contributions by Tiesha Cassel, Shay Welch, Khimaja R. Connell, Abosede Priscilla Ipadeola, Martina Kopf, Margaret A. McLaren, Priyanka Jha, Kanchana Mahadevan, Un-sunn Lee, and Yoko Arisaka.
In the rich field of the histories of philosophy, certain voices have been elevated to prominence while others have lingered in the margins, awaiting their moment to be heard. The volume Women Beyond the Canon: Philosophies and Feminisms seeks to give expression to these voices and to unravel the threads of traditional narratives, weaving together perspectives that have long been relegated to the periphery of philosophical discourse.
Philosophy is only just beginning—later than other humanities disciplines—to face the challenges of an increasingly globalized world and the associated and inescapable but difficult task of decolonization. For it is not only the exclusion of philosophical traditions from other regions of the world or the exclusion of women—both from the history of philosophy as well as the mainstream philosophical debates of the present—that is under criticism, but more fundamentally the claims to truth and universal validity associated with philosophical theories.
In jüngerer Zeit gibt es vermehrt Debatten um „relationale Ontologien“. Mit diesem Begriff bezeichnet man Ansätze, in denen das Sein nicht isoliert oder als Eigenschaften voneinander unabhängiger Einheiten gedacht wird, sondern von vornherein als in Beziehungen stehend. Im Gegensatz zur sogenannten Substanzontologie liegt der Fokus auf den Beziehungen zwischen Entitäten, die als grundlegender betrachtet werden als vermeintlich stabile, selbstidentische Entitäten. Heute werden solche Ideen auch in Europa/Nordamerika wieder lebhaft diskutiert – und zwar nicht nur in der Philosophie, sondern auch in anderen Wissenschaften, von der Informatik bis hin zur Psychologie. Besonders stark verbreitet – und historisch tief verwurzelt – sind Vorstellungen einer relationalen Ontologie jedoch schon lange in sogenannten indigenen Wissensbeständen in Afrika, den Amerikas oder Ozeanien.

This article examines academic endeavors that philosophize in Wolof, tracing a rich intellectual lineage from Cheikh Anta Diop to Souleymane Bachir Diagne. Through contextual analysis of key texts, Dr. Rohmer explores how questions of translation…

In an era marked by intensified global interconnectivity, technological transformation, and resurgent political polarizations, the role and responsibility of philosophy – and philosophy education – require urgent rethinking. Philosophy, as both a discipline and a pedagogical practice, is undergoing profound…

Je reviens d’un colloque très couru à Douala. Des philosophes du monde entier quasiment et de multiples nationalités sont venues d’Asie (notamment de l’Iran), de l’Amérique latine, des États-Unis, de l’Europe (Allemagne, Tchéquie, etc.), de…